https://usa-girls.jouwvindplaats.nl/ https://usa-girls.sieraad4you.nl/ https://usa-girls.linkminer.nl/ https://usa-girls.18plusbegin.com/ https://usa-girls.seniorencentrum.nl/ https://usa-girls.linkstartup.nl/ https://usa-girls.hoeverandertmijnzorg.nl/ https://usa-girls.denieuwezorgverzekering.nl/ More important, science cannot answer the question “Why science?” That’s really the decisive point here. The first philosopher to reason backward to this point, see the dead end, and turn to “the human things” is the first political philosopher and hence the first true philosopher. The investigation of the human things, or human opinion about good and bad, turns out to reveal more meaning that the investigation of physical causes. It is this investigation that sketches the outlines of natural right. Now, I must say something about “standards of proof.” The complete victory of science beginning in the 17th century has reduced philosophy either to the status of historical interest only, or myth, or something fun to spend time on, but definitely not “truth.” What happened is that science succeeded in making its standard the only standard. Show me mathematical proof through peer-reviewed method, double-blind, replicable by others, and predictive, or else you are just speculation. This standard works wonders for the natural world but does nothing for the human things. What “works” for the human things is dialectic, through which common opinion is examined in the attempt to ascend from opinion to truth. That ascent will not accomplish “scientific proof” because it can’t. He who demands that is a priori closed to philosophy. Probably contradictorily, but that’s another topic. Dialectic can suss out and dismiss the false opinions, which is essential for the ascent to truth. But that is not by itself truth. In fact, “truth” about man can probably never be established in the way we want. (But then again, so is all scientific truth subject to later revision, ask Newton.) But simply ridding ourselves of the false opinions is a great boon. And then being aware of the fundamental possible alternatives is a greater boon. Understanding the probabilities about which of the fundamental alternatives is still greater. Greatest of all is … but I will stop there.